Pictures at an Exhibition
Zbigniew Ignacy
Brzostowski
Aleksandra Jadczuk’s „Pictures at an Exhibition”
w
plastrze miodu
są
przestrzenie podłużnie oddychające spokojem
w plastrze miodu są
zakątki pełne żywych płatków liści
[in a honeycomb
there are spaces breathing peace along
in
a honeycomb there are nooks full of living leaves]
Halina
Poświatowska[1]
There is a painting by Aleksandra Jadczuk that one
could call musical. An elongated figure of a man – as in El Greco, one of the
artist’s favourite painters[2] – sitting on a chair and blowing a tin trumpet, all
set against a smooth wall. And if we could imagine what tune he is playing,
perhaps it would be Modest Mussorgsky’s “Promenade”, leading the listener
through his “Pictures from an Exhibition” (1874), a suite which was inspired by
the drawings and watercolours of Viktor Hartmann[3]. The musician in the painting is inviting the viewer
into the softly illuminated interior, where we can expect to see an exhibition
of paintings by the author, Aleksandra Jadczuk. The evocation of the musical
illustration is justified not only as a pretext for a brief stroll in front of
the painter’s works, but also as a reference to her family’s artistic
tradition. Aleksandra’s grandfather Pavel Balakirev (1914-1968) and her uncle
Oleg (1944-1977) were painters, and the family is related to Mily Balakirev
(1837-1910), a pianist and a conductor, the leader of the famous Mighty Handful,
and, incidentally, the initiator of the erection of the Fryderyk Chopin’s
monument in Żelazowa Wola[4]. One could say that tradition oblige and, in
keeping with it, Aleksandra Jadczuk (born in Gdańsk in 1974) has always been
interested in painting. This interest led her to the Faculty of Painting and
Graphics at the Academy of Fine Arts in Gdańsk, which she graduated from in
2001 with a degree in painting from the Studio of Prof. Maciej Świeszewski and
in mural painting from the Studio of Prof. Andrzej Dyakowski. In 2003, she was
employed as an assistant in the 5th Studio of Drawing and Painting at the
Academy of Fine Arts in Gdańsk under the supervision of Prof. Józef
Czerniawski. She then progressed through the steps of her academic career to
become a professor at her alma mater and the Deputy Dean of the Faculty of
Painting. Her works span the fields of painting, drawing, printmaking and
photography[5].
Listening to “Promenade”, let us enter the “exhibition”
and see what the painter has prepared for us. These are not individual
paintings, but rather groupings of works linked by theme, technique or method
of artistic exploration. Such an arrangement is imposed by the artist herself,
who as a rule avoids giving titles to her exhibitions and paintings, leaving
the viewer free to make associations and interpretations[6]. Throughout the years of her studies and until at
least a decade after graduation, Aleksandra Jadczuk was working in
representational painting, focusing mainly on still life, landscapes and
interior views. With time, her interests and creative explorations turned
towards abstraction, as she says: I concluded that I was most interested in
purely painterly problems, i.e. colour, matter, form, so I moved away from a
direct interpretation of reality[7]. This change
looks to be quite radical also in terms of painting techniques: the closed
compositions of the early period are mainly oil paintings – the ones which are
the most appreciated by the artist – while the open abstract compositions are
works created with acrylic paints. Sometimes the painter also uses tempera
paints, stain or water glass. I like it – she says – when different
paints react with each other, and I get an unexpected effect[8].
Since we have been introduced to Aleksandra Jadczuk’s
work by a musician, let us pause for a while at a group of paintings whose
protagonists are musical men, inscribed in geometrized interiors, perhaps more
surreal than real, with a touch of vibe straight out of 1920s film set design.
Then there are interiors with figures hidden in dark corners, with figures that
are only a pretext to show the poignant emptiness of the interior behind them. The
work depicting a scene of a family celebration in the interior is particularly
noteworthy. We find there the figure of Pierrot, who foreshadows another series
of paintings. However, let us return to the interiors, which do not evoke any
dark associations, but exude warmth and joy. These are the ones where, instead
of dark human silhouettes, the artist placed animals, such as the white dog
sitting on the sill of a high window, behind which stretches a green, idyllic
landscape, merging with a bright blue sky on the horizon. This is how we move
on to painterly landscapes. We emerge from crammed interiors into vast spaces.
Painted in bright, warm yellows, fields of ripe crops, the rich greens of
grasses and trees, bright shades of blue over the horizon. This is rhythmically
juxtaposed with vertical dark railings in the foreground or, conversely, wooden
fences on the horizon, reminiscent of the xylophones, which the wind plays “Promenade”
on, inviting us to the next group of paintings.
With the picket fences still in mind, casually
imposing a rhythm reminiscent of the rhythms in Witold Wojtkiewicz’s famous
cycles of paintings, we will not be so surprised when we face a group of works
so strikingly resembling motifs from Wojtkiewicz. Children with serious, grim
faces, as if they were small adults. Their silhouettes furnish empty interiors,
where only light fills the space, creating a mood of melancholy and nostalgia
for something unattainable. Just like Wojtkiewicz, hopelessly in love with
Maryna Pareńska[9], giving the faces of dolls and fairy tale characters,
the protagonists of his unusual paintings, the features of people from Maryna’s
surroundings and her own[10], Jadczuk offers her child characters the faces of
real people from her own life. She also introduces symbolic objects in these works,
always with the outline of a circle or sphere, taking the shape of a children’s
ball, a stylized wheel of a Roma cart or an Indian dream catcher. They can be
interpreted as a reference to the forms by which the sun was represented in
ancient cultures, but also in modern times, when it is associated with the
proverbial spark of hope for a good day ahead. The words of one of Jacques
Brel’s songs come irresistibly to mind here: as long as there is hope for
tomorrow, life is worth living.
The paintings attract the viewer’s attention with
another interesting motif – children’s toys. These include the aforementioned
ball and, above all, wooden rocking horses, the dream of many children in the
pre-computer era. These horses, the embodiment of children’s desires, introduce
a note of joy into Aleksandra Jadczuk’s paintings and a nostalgia for a time
irretrievably lost. However, the main theme is different – it is light and
form. This is best seen in the painting, in which toy horses seem to move in a
circle on the illuminated floor of an empty room. The heavily exposed,
herringbone-patterned wooden tiles build up the dynamism and expression of the
painting. They indicate the next direction which the sounds of “Promenade” will
lead us to.
Dynamics and power gush from the canvases[11] where great
steam locomotives emerge in clouds of steam from an indeterminate background.
They shine with an oily, golden sheen on greasy trusses, joints, valves and
pistons, brass flashes on polished buffers and wheel rims again alluding to the
solar symbolism that had previously recurred in paintings of children’s games. On
the one hand, the works in this group clearly evoke associations with the
classics of impressionist painting – William Turner’s “Rain, Steam, Speed”[12] or the series
of Claude Monet’s Saint-Lazare railway station views[13]; on the other hand, these canvases reveal Aleksandra
Jadczuk’s unprecedented – maybe hidden – fascination with the power of
machines. The machines which, like bulls from the artist’s favourite Spanish
paintings[14], symbolize not only the primeval power and tenacity,
but also the passion, vitality and energy. The artist’s paintings show clashes
of light, air and clouds of steam, but also streaks of reddish traces of blood
on the sand of the arena.
A different, much more subdued emotion is evoked by
works related to the sea, a maritime episode in the painter’s oeuvre, so to
speak. These paintings mainly depict traditional rows of moored fishing boats. A
particularly noteworthy example, however, can be found in the work depicting a
fishing boat at the quay, painted with broad brushstrokes. The composition of
the painting is divided diagonally from the lower edge on the left to the upper
edge on the right. To the right of this hypothetical line, a pier running right
in depth is shown, divided rhythmically by the outlines of the planks that it
is built of. On the left, a cutter moored to the quay is depicted in bold
perspective, distinguished from the pier by the predominance of circular forms
or arches. Shades of ochre and the colours of the cool Baltic – greens and
blues – dominate. The freedom which the work was painted with brings to mind a
fragment of a poem by Stanisław Grochowiak, a poet who dreamed of being a
painter:
(…)
ukryty czujnie
Za
plecami Gauguina, wygiętymi w pałąk urzędniczego garbu; patrzył,
Jak
on łatwo kładzie
Te
swoje ugry i sieny palone, nie pędzlem,
Lecz
szpachlą.
Boże miłosierny
–
[hidden cautiously
Behind
Gaugin’s back, arched into a clerk’s hump; he looked
How
easily he lays
His
ochres and burnt siennas, not with a brush
But
with a spatula.
Oh, merciful God –][15]
These maritime works also include several small
stained-glass windows. The quarters with the shape of large fish, filled with
shoals of glass “fishy trinkets”, do not conceal any mystery, but the light
seeping through the stained-glass windows in a calm straw colour offers a sense
of calm and abundance, while the red and blue reflections suggest the richness
of marine life. And again, this time from behind the colour of the stained
glass windows, the familiar melody of “Promenade” seems to be resounding, now
extracted from a small tin foghorn.
We move on to the most interesting group of paintings –
still lifes. It is strange, but the artist claims that she is not even fond of
this genre of painting, especially since she has experienced an excess of it in
Dutch museums[16]. However, it is her still lifes – despite her
attitude – that most seduce viewers with the harmonious beauty, composition,
range of colours, form, the matter of the objects depicted, in other words,
everything that Aleksandra Jadczuk sees as the most significant aspects of her
art[17]. Perhaps it was a trust in her artistic intuition –
more than a considered, rational concept – that dominated the work on the still
lifes. Here, the painter decisively departed from traditional mimetics,
following the example of Paul Cézanne, who wanted to explore the relationship
between colour and form, and used “correct perspective” only to the extent that
he needed it for a specific experiment[18]. The
influence of Picasso’s and Braque’s still lifes is no less evident in these
works. Aleksandra Jadczuk retains a three-dimensional foreground in some of
them, but she consistently builds up space, like these artists, abandoning deep
linear perspective. She closes the depth of perspective in the background with
some kind of curtain, a blind window, a wall or a colourful structure that is
difficult to identify. In some of the works, the deep perspective is replaced
by the two-dimensionality and forward displacement of objects that is
characteristic of archaic art: objects from further away are placed at the top
and those closer to the viewer are placed at the bottom of the canvas, the
shapes of the objects indicate a multiplicity of viewpoints. The foreground,
however, always contrasts with the flat background. The spectrum of objects
used in the compositions is quite traditional – mainly glass, ceramic and tin
vessels, fruits, vegetables, fish, sometimes flowers. These are just forms,
derived from basic shapes; their charm and their calm, refined beauty was
achieved by the artist using pure, luminous colours, light falling on the
objects, a balanced gradation of tones and a harmony of colours.
And once again “Promenade” opens a new collection, new
attempts and realizations, a new period in Aleksandra Jadczuk’s work. After
years of creating representational paintings, referring directly to nature and
interpreting reality, the artist started to turn towards abstraction in the
second decade of the 21st century. This is how she herself characterizes this
time: at the beginning, the first works of this type featured simplified,
geometrized organic forms and signs with still clearly discernible echoes of
the real world. However, I was determined and consistent in my efforts to
create arrangements of colours, forms or planes that would, as far as possible,
spontaneously reveal the designed content. (…) Since then, I have
systematically developed and deepened the process of abstracting the image.
Combining experience, knowledge and intuition, I did not assume or accept any
model of abstraction in advance. (…) I moved slowly from observation and
analysis of selected phenomena to their maximum synthesis, from the image of a
reflection of reality to the image of a sign.[19] We
allow ourselves to be caught in these – as Julio Cortázar wrote – snares of
geometry, by means of which our Western existence is meant to be ordered: the
axis, the centre, the raison d’être, the omphalos, the names of Indo-European
longings[20]. And so, looking at Aleksandra Jadczuk’s abstract
pictures, we can subconsciously feel a kind of warning – the words of Plato,
which, as the legend goes, he was supposed to have placed above the entrance to
the Academy: Let no one ignorant of geometry enter[21]. Although the relationship with mathematics does not
seem so obvious, when we look at individual canvases, we find numerous examples
of shapes that can be recognized as references to nature: geometrized
landscapes, plants, water, organic forms, celestial bodies. By referring to
real matter, the artist gives the matter a new order – the order of aesthetics[22]. And in this pursuit, she arrives at the practice of
geometric abstraction, in which she currently finds the meaning of her creative
search. The most characteristic feature of these investigations is the
consistent construction of open pictorial compositions made up of individual
images. I investigate – says the artist – the congruence and
relationship of individual images in the constructed structure of the whole image.
Each element is simultaneously a whole and a part. I create coherent systems of
varying dynamics, as well as three-dimensional painterly objects[23].
The individual canvases depicting concrete geometric
figures, juxtaposed in more or less complex forms of various sizes, create new
qualities linked by shape, colour, contrast, value, the structure of the
matter, and finally rhythm[24]. The spectator can move around these signs
symbolically by throwing an imaginary flat stone to play “hopscotch” and
stopping where the stone falls. This childish ritual of pebbles and hopping
on one foot, leading to Heaven[25] may seem
amusing, but it is just as valid for the reception of these abstract,
constructed images as other, more “scientific” cognitive methods. We can
therefore ignore the irony-laden opinions relating to Aleksandra Jadczuk’s
activities in the field of abstract art[26] and look at
it from the perspective of geometrical references. May we get inspiration from
the words of Galileo Galilei: the Universe […] is written in a
mathematical language, and the letters are triangles, circles and other
geometrical figures, without which it is humanely impossible to comprehend a
single word[27]. Obviously, the route of the artists’ formal
procedures in creating geometric abstractions seems to have been mathematical
analysis in the first place, which, at least in theory, should be a
guarantee of the objectivity of the creative material. This was the case
with Jerzy Grabowski[28], who created his abstractions primarily based on the
figures of a square and a triangle based on the diagonal of this square.
However, in Aleksandra Jadczuk’s case, it seems that mathematical analysis does
not dominate her abstract painting, and the artist is primarily guided by her experience
and intuition. Looking at the painter’s abstract works from different years, we
see that the dominant module is the rectangle, but, surprisingly, not the
golden one, delineated by the golden ratio, which seems to be the figure best
perceived by the eye[29], but a Silver and a Cordovan rectangle[30]. It seems as if the painter was subconsciously
inclined towards the models of abstract ancient art, so abundantly represented,
for example, in Islamic art or – in a different field – in Bach’s fugues[31]. Examples thereof can be found in the repeated motifs
built on a square base but ultimately taking the shape of a polygon. From such
polygons, a regular arrangement is created, which can be extended indefinitely,
creating a configuration of rhythms and colour relationships between the
modules. It would not be out of place here to recall the achievements of
Maurits Cornelis Escher, who derived part of his strongly geometrized art from
impressions he had while looking at the Alhambra[32]. Coming back to Aleksandra Jadczuk’s achievements in
the field of abstract art, it should be emphasized that the artist assumes,
above all, the reception of her work through sensual experience, which is
influenced by the form, colour, rhythms, tensions between individual parts of
the composition. She leaves mathematical analysis to those who wish to delve
deeper into the problems of abstraction.
The art of the Gdansk painter, which we get to know
symbolically by going through “Pictures from an Exhibition”, although it
manifests itself in different, seemingly distant genres, always shows similar
features. And not only is it about a mastery of form, colour, mood, but above
all it is an affirmative work, even when depicting melancholic moods.
Fortunately, such an outlook is increasingly noticeable in artistic creation
after periods of many contemporary art trends defined by negation[33]. Negation, decay and a stubborn pursuit of bleak
chaos are simply boring[34], take away the will to live and do not build anything
positive. At most, they evoke a feeling of gloom and bitterness, and we don’t
really know why. Aleksandra Jadczuk, on the other hand, seeks positive values,
regularity, as in the honeycomb from Halina Poświatowska’s poem quoted at the
beginning. She looks for harmony, balance between cold and warm colours,
between art and life.
We are already leaving the “exhibition” of the Gdansk
painter Aleksandra Jadczuk, again, to the sounds of Modest Mussorgsky’s “Promenade”,
which was taking us from one group of paintings to another, but let us now indulge
in the orchestration of the piece by Maurice Ravel.
[1] H.
Poświatowska, (w plastrze miodu…), w: Wszystkie wiersze, Kraków
2000, s. 221.
[2] Recenzja
z wystawy oraz wywiad z artystką. Wywiad przeprowadzony w dniu 19.09.2014, online: vivaoliva.pl/?strona=wydarzenie&idw=784,
[dost.: 24.01.2021].
[3] B.
Schaeffer, Dzieje muzyki, Warszawa 1983, s. 323.
[4] Ibidem,
s. 321. Nie od rzeczy będzie przypomnieć, iż do Potężnej Gromadki zaliczali
się: Milij Bałakiriew, Aleksander Borodin, Cezar Cui, Modest Musorgski, Mikołaj
Rimski-Korsakow.
[5] Aleksandra
Jadczuk,
w: Metafora i rzeczywistość. Akademia Sztuk Pięknych w Gdańsku w latach
2005-2015, red. Zespół, ASP w Gdańsku, Gdańsk 2015, s. 242; Aleksandra
Jadczuk, w: Wokół Obrazu, Katalog wystawy, Centrum sztuki Galeria
EL, ASP w Gdańsku, Elbląg 2012, s. 17.
[6] A.
Jadczuk, Autoreferat i opis osiągnięcia artystycznego, ASP w Gdańsku, s.
9, online: C:/Users/admin/Desktop/autoreferat-1_Jadczuk%20(2).pdf, [dost.:
14.10.2023].
[7] Ibidem,
s. 4.
[8] Recenzja
z wystawy oraz wywiad z artystką. Wywiad przeprowadzony w dniu 19.09.2014, online:
vivaoliva.pl/?strona=wydarzenie&idw=784, [dost.: 24.01.2021].
[9] M.
Śliwińska, Muzy Młodej Polski. Życie i świat Marii, Zofii i Elizy Pareńskich,
Warszawa 2014, s. 143.
[10] Ibidem,
s. 147; Z. Nowakówna, Witold Wojtkiewicz. Życie i twórczość, „Sztuka i
krytyka. Materiały do studiów i dyskusji z zakresu teorii i historii sztuki,
krytyki artystycznej oraz badań nad sztuką”, Warszawa 1956, R. VII, nr 3-4
(27-28).
[11] Aleksandra
Jadczuk,
w: Artyści Galerii ZPAP 2006, Gdańsk 2006, s. 58-63.
[12] M.
Rzepińska, Historia koloru w dziejach malarstwa europejskiego, t. 2,
Warszawa 1989, il. 70.
[13] E. H.
Gombrich, O sztuce, przeł. M. Dolińska, I. Kossowska, D.
Stefańska-Szewczuk, A. Kuczyńska, Poznań 2016, s. 520; Z. Kępiński, Impresjonizm,
Warszawa 1982, s. 170-171.
[14] Recenzja
z wystawy oraz wywiad z artystką. Wywiad przeprowadzony w dniu 19.09.2014, online:
vivaoliva.pl/?strona=wydarzenie&idw=784, [dost.: 24.01.2021].
[15] St.
Grochowiak, Bilard, w: Bilard, Warszawa 1975, s. 6.
[16] Recenzja
z wystawy oraz wywiad z artystką. Wywiad z artystką przeprowadzony w dniu
19.09. 2014,
online: vivaoliva.pl/?strona=wydarzenie&idw=784, [dost.: 24.01.2021].
[17] Ibidem.
[18] E. H.
Gombrich, op. cit., s. 548.
[19] A.
Jadczuk, Autoreferat i opis osiągnięcia artystycznego, ASP w Gdańsku, s.
4, online: C:/Userus/admin/Desktop/autoreferat-1_Jadczuk%20(2).pdf,
[dost.:14.10.2023].
[20] J.
Cortázar, Gra w klasy, przeł. Z Chądzyńska, Kraków-Wrocław 1985, s. 18.
[21] Cf., np. T. Heath, A History of Greek Mathematics,
vol. 1, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1921, s. 284.
[22] J.
Arbonés, P. Milrud, Harmonia tkwi w liczbach. Muzyka i matematyka,
przeł. K. Rączka, RBA Coleccionables, S.A.U., Barcelona 2022, s. 63.
[23] Aleksandra
Jadczuk,
w: Metafora i rzeczywistość. Akademia Sztuk Pięknych w Gdańsku w latach
2005-2015, red. Zespół, ASP w Gdańsku, Gdańsk 2015, s. 242.
[24] Cf. Arkusz
Wydziału Malarstwa Akademii Sztuk Pięknych w Gdańsku. Aleksandra Jadczuk,
w: „Bliza”, Gdynia nr 1(39) 2021, nie numerowany; Recenzja wystawy oraz
wywiad z artystką. Wywiad przeprowadzony w dniu 19.09.2014, online:
vivaoliva.pl/?strona=wydarzenie&idw=784, [dost.: 24.01.2021]; J.
Gramczyńska, Malarstwo Aleksandry Jadczuk w Szczecinie, Szczecin 2018,
online: http://www.sztukawszczecinie.pl/aktualnie-w-szczecinie/malarstwo-aleksandry-jadczuk/, [dost.: 25.01.2021].
[25] J. Cortázar, op. cit., s. 25.
[26] Malarstwo
Aleksandry
Jadczuk w Galerii ASP (Dom Angielski), w: Dyskurs Lokalny, nr
listopadowo-grudniowy (12) 2020, b.s., b.a.
[27] Cyt.
za: W. Tatarkiewicz, Historia filozofii, t. 2, Warszawa 1988, s. 43.
[28] R.
Wiśniewski, Słowo wstępne, w: Jerzy Grabowski. Między matematyką a
emocją, (katalog), NCK Kordegarda, Warszawa 2022, s. 7.
[29] F.
Corbalán, Złota proporcja. Matematyka piękna, przeł. W. Bartol, RBA
Coleccionables, Barcelona 2022, s. 47-56.
[30] Ibidem,
s. 61-62.
[31] W.
Heisenberg, Tendencja do abstrakcji we współczesnej sztuce i nauce, w: Ponad
granicami, przeł. K. Wolicki, Słowo wstępne A. K. Wróblewski, Warszawa
1979, s. 249. (referat wygłoszony na sympozjum Fundacji H. von Karajana w
Salzburgu w 1969 roku); C. Alsina, Wyznawcy liczb. Twierdzenie Pitagorasa,
przeł. J. Piórek, RBA Coleccionables, Barcelona 2022, s. 48.
[32] F.
Corbalán, op. cit., s. 81.
[33] Cf. W. Heisenberg, op. cit., s.
245.
[34] Cf. W. Heisenberg, op. cit., s.
249.